Tribunal Cases
All 12 Housing & Property Chamber decisions involving Greenbelt Group Limited
The homeowner complained about incorrect billing and a debt recovery letter. The tribunal found the issue had been resolved with compensation and dismissed the application.
The homeowner complained about the property factor's communication, financial transparency, and maintenance of communal areas. The tribunal found the factor acted reasonably and dismissed the complaint, noting the homeowner's criticisms were unwarranted.
The homeowner's application was rejected because they failed to provide necessary information and evidence to the tribunal, including proof of notifying the property factor of their concerns. The tribunal found the application incomplete and therefore dismissed it.
The homeowner's application was rejected because they failed to provide necessary information and documentation as requested by the tribunal, including evidence of prior communication with the property factor. The tribunal found the application could not be accepted.
The homeowner complained that the factor failed to comply with their duties. The tribunal determined it did not have jurisdiction due to a complex issue with the title deeds and dismissed the application.
The homeowner complained about the property factor's failure to comply with a Property Factor Enforcement Order. The tribunal found that the factor had complied with the order, including providing compensation and taking steps to address the issues. The tribunal dismissed the complaint.
The homeowner had a Property Factor Enforcement Order issued against the factor. The tribunal determined the factor had complied with the order.
The homeowner had a Property Factor Enforcement Order issued against the factor. The tribunal determined the factor had complied with the order.
The homeowner had a Property Factor Enforcement Order issued against the factor. The tribunal determined the factor had complied with the order.
The homeowner's complaints about the factors' conduct were dismissed by the tribunal. The tribunal found the factors had complied with their obligations and the homeowner's claims were not supported.
The homeowner complained about the property factor's lack of woodland maintenance and documentation. The tribunal found the factor had met its obligations and dismissed the complaints.
The homeowner's application was rejected because they failed to provide requested information after multiple requests. The tribunal dismissed the application.