Ethical Maintenance C.I.C has faced 1 tribunal case since 2021, with 1 adverse outcome (100% upheld or breach). Most recent: June 2026.

Tribunal Rating GREEN How is this calculated?

Only 1 adverse case and no PFEO breaches (low-volume cap).

1 Cases
100% Upheld (median: 50%)
12.4 Adjusted rate/10k (median: 6.6)
1 PFEOs
£100 Compensation

The adjusted rate weights PFEO-breached cases ×3.0 and complied cases ×1.5; the unweighted adverse rate is 8.3 per 10,000 properties. Benchmarks are sector medians across factors with at least one case since 2021.

Cases Over Time

2026
1

Outcomes

1 PFEO Complied 100.0%

Complaint Types

Based on 1 analysed case.

Communication
1

Enforcement & Compensation

Enforcement Orders (PFEOs)

1 of 1 case (100%)

Compensation Awarded

£100 total

Largest: £100 (FTS/HPC/PF/24/5860)

Notable Cases

FTS/HPC/PF/24/5860
PFEO Complied ⚠ PFEO Issued
2026-06-01 · £100 compensation

The respondent was found to have breached its property factor duties by unreasonably delaying the issue of an invoice for an urgent lift repair, contrary to WSS Clause 9 response obligations, even though in practice funds were reallocated to complete the repair. A PFEO requiring a £100 credit to the applicant's factoring account was proposed on 1 June 2026, formally issued on 13 July 2026, and both parties confirmed compliance by 26 August 2026. Complaints about roof repair delays and inappropriate charging were not upheld, and the data protection complaint was found to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

Communication
"the delay in issuing the invoice for a matter of this kind was a breach of the Clause 9 obligations and therefore a breach of the Respondent's property factor's duties"

All Cases

Date Reference Outcome PFEO Comp.
2026-06-01 24/5860 PFEO Complied PFEO £100 Details

Data from Housing & Property Chamber. Cases decided since 2021..

Case Details

Click "Details" in the table above to jump to a case.

24/5860 2026-06-01
PFEO Complied PFEO Issued £100

The respondent was found to have breached its property factor duties by unreasonably delaying the issue of an invoice for an urgent lift repair, contrary to WSS Clause 9 response obligations, even though in practice funds were reallocated to complete the repair. A PFEO requiring a £100 credit to the applicant's factoring account was proposed on 1 June 2026, formally issued on 13 July 2026, and both parties confirmed compliance by 26 August 2026. Complaints about roof repair delays and inappropriate charging were not upheld, and the data protection complaint was found to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

Communication
"the delay in issuing the invoice for a matter of this kind was a breach of the Clause 9 obligations and therefore a breach of the Respondent's property factor's duties"

How We Calculate Ratings

Ratings are based on a factor's adjusted adverse case rate per 10,000 properties for cases decided since 2021. Cases involving Property Factor Enforcement Orders (PFEOs) are weighted more heavily.

Rating Bands

CLEAN No cases decided against the factor since 2021
GREEN PFEO-weighted adverse rate at or below 10 per 10,000 properties (or 2 or fewer adverse cases with no PFEO breach)
ORANGE Weighted rate above 10 and up to 30 per 10,000
RED PFEO-weighted adverse rate above 30 per 10,000 properties
LIMITED Fewer than 50 properties on record to rate reliably

Special Rules

  • Factors with only 2 or fewer adverse cases (no PFEO breaches) are capped at GREEN
  • Pending or proposed PFEOs count at ×1.0 until the outcome is decided — there is no minimum-band override

Read our full methodology →

Data Updates

  • Last updated: October 2026
  • Next update: Monthly

We update quarterly. For the latest decisions, search the HPC directly →

Looking for alternatives?

We'll shortlist vetted factors with better tribunal records covering your area — free, no obligation.

Find a Better Factor

← Back to Ethical Maintenance C.I.C profile