Tribunal Cases
All 10 Housing & Property Chamber decisions involving Bield Housing & Care
The homeowner's application was rejected because they failed to provide required information, including evidence of notifying the property factor of their concerns, as requested by the tribunal.
The homeowners complained about the factor's failure to comply with the Code of Conduct. The tribunal found the factor in breach and ordered them to pay each homeowner £300 for the inconvenience.
The homeowner complained about the factor's handling of funds and financial transparency. The tribunal found the factor had complied with the Code of Conduct and the Deed of Conditions, and no breaches were found.
The homeowner complained about multiple issues, including lack of consultation and financial discrepancies. The tribunal found that many of the complaints had been previously addressed and rejected the application, but did amend the decision to consider the written statement and other issues.
The homeowner complained about several issues, including a damaged letter and the factor's handling of complaints. The tribunal found the factor had not breached its duties and dismissed the application.
The homeowner complained that the property factor misled him and failed to respond to emails promptly. The tribunal found that the factor did not breach the code of conduct and dismissed the application.
The homeowner complained about the factor's misleading communication in a letter about a meeting. The tribunal found the letter was misleading and ordered the factor to ensure proper minutes of meetings are taken in the future.
The homeowner complained that the property factor misled him and failed to respond to emails promptly. The tribunal found the factor did not breach the code of conduct and dismissed the application.
The homeowner complained about the factor's handling of her complaint. The tribunal found the factor had failed to comply with the Property Factor Code of Conduct and ordered the factor to issue a written apology and pay £200 compensation.
The homeowner complained about flooding and a chemical smell in her flat, as well as the factor's handling of these issues. The tribunal found the factor had not breached its duties and did not issue any orders.