Ratings & Reviews
Tribunal Record
REDRecent Tribunal Decisions
The homeowner's application was rejected because they failed to provide required information, including evidence of notifying the property factor of their concerns, as requested by the tribunal.
The homeowners complained about the factor's failure to comply with the Code of Conduct. The tribunal found the factor in breach and ordered them to pay each homeowner £300 for the inconvenience.
The homeowner complained about the factor's handling of funds and financial transparency. The tribunal found the factor had complied with the Code of Conduct and the Deed of Conditions, and no breaches were found.
The homeowner complained about multiple issues, including lack of consultation and financial discrepancies. The tribunal found that many of the complaints had been previously addressed and rejected the application, but did amend the decision to consider the written statement and other issues.
The homeowner complained about several issues, including a damaged letter and the factor's handling of complaints. The tribunal found the factor had not breached its duties and dismissed the application.
Company Information
Coverage Area
Tribunal data: Sourced from Housing and Property Chamber published decisions. Risk tier calculated as cases per 10,000 properties managed. "RED" = 100+ cases per 10k or multiple enforcement orders.
Reviews: Trustpilot and Google review data aggregated from public sources via APIs.
Company data: Companies House API. Factor register data from gov.scot. TPI membership verified via tpi.org.uk.
Data last updated: January 2026.