Macfie & Co Management Services Ltd tribunal record
Decisions published January 2021 – September 2026 · Updated October 2026
Macfie & Co Management Services Ltd has faced 2 tribunal cases since 2021, with 1 adverse outcome (50% upheld or breach). Most recent: January 2025.
Only 1 adverse case and no PFEO breaches (low-volume cap).
The adjusted rate weights PFEO-breached cases ×3.0 and complied cases ×1.5; the unweighted adverse rate is 2.3 per 10,000 properties. Benchmarks are sector medians across factors with at least one case since 2021.
Cases Over Time
Outcomes
Complaint Types
Based on 1 analysed case.
Enforcement & Compensation
Enforcement Orders (PFEOs)
1 of 2 cases (50%)
Compensation Awarded
£0 total
Notable Cases
The Tribunal found the factor failed to provide transparent accounting and had no authority to operate a fabric fund on the homeowner's behalf. It made a PFEO ordering the factor to account for the homeowner's fabric fund contributions and pay any surplus.
"The Tribunal has decided that the Property Factor requires to account to the Homeowner for his contributions towards the fabric fund and pay him any surplus due to him in respect of his contributions to the fabric fund."
All Cases
| Date | Reference | Outcome | PFEO | Comp. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-16 | 23/0918 |
PFEO Complied | PFEO | — | Details |
| 2022-01-10 | 21/2337 |
Rejected | — | — | Details |
Data from Housing & Property Chamber. Cases decided since 2021..
Case Details
Click "Details" in the table above to jump to a case.
23/0918
2025-01-16
The Tribunal found the factor failed to provide transparent accounting and had no authority to operate a fabric fund on the homeowner's behalf. It made a PFEO ordering the factor to account for the homeowner's fabric fund contributions and pay any surplus.
"The Tribunal has decided that the Property Factor requires to account to the Homeowner for his contributions towards the fabric fund and pay him any surplus due to him in respect of his contributions to the fabric fund."
21/2337
2022-01-10
The Tribunal rejected the application because the applicant failed to provide evidence of authority to act on behalf of the homeowner, thus not meeting the requirements for lodging an application.
"the application should be rejected in terms of Rule 8(1) (c) which states that an application must be rejected if the Tribunal has “good reason to believe that it would not be appropriate to accept the application.”"
How We Calculate Ratings
Ratings are based on a factor's adjusted adverse case rate per 10,000 properties for cases decided since 2021. Cases involving Property Factor Enforcement Orders (PFEOs) are weighted more heavily.
Rating Bands
Special Rules
- Factors with only 2 or fewer adverse cases (no PFEO breaches) are capped at GREEN
- Pending or proposed PFEOs count at ×1.0 until the outcome is decided — there is no minimum-band override
Data Updates
- Last updated: October 2026
- Next update: Monthly
We update quarterly. For the latest decisions, search the HPC directly →
Looking for alternatives?
We'll shortlist vetted factors with better tribunal records covering your area — free, no obligation.
Find a Better Factor