Tribunal Record
EXPIREDRecent Tribunal Decisions
The homeowner's application was rejected because they did not provide the required documentation, including proof of notifying the property factor of their concerns and a copy of the written statement of services.
The homeowner complained about the property factor's failure to adhere to maintenance obligations. The tribunal found the factor had complied with a previous Property Factor Enforcement Order and closed the case.
The homeowner complained about the property factor's failure to comply with a previous order. The tribunal found the factor had not fully complied and issued a Property Factor Enforcement Order, including a financial credit and required changes to procedures and record-keeping.
The homeowner complained that the property factor failed to comply with the Code of Conduct by not including the basis of its authority to act in its Written Statement of Services and failing to consult with homeowners before instructing work. The tribunal agreed and issued a Property Factor Enforcement Order.
The homeowner's complaint resulted in a Property Factor Enforcement Order. The tribunal found the factor had complied with the order.
Company Information
Tribunal data: Sourced from Housing and Property Chamber published decisions. Risk tier calculated as cases per 10,000 properties managed. "RED" = 100+ cases per 10k or multiple enforcement orders.
Reviews: Trustpilot and Google review data aggregated from public sources via APIs.
Company data: Companies House API. Factor register data from gov.scot. TPI membership verified via tpi.org.uk.
Data last updated: January 2026.