'
D&

D & I Scott Property Management

PF000114 2,401 properties AMBER Risk

Ratings & Reviews

Google
4.4
71 reviews • 1 office
Read reviews →

Tribunal Record

AMBER
5
Total Cases
2
PFEOs Issued
£700
Compensation
1
Last 3 Years
2
Comp. Cases
4.0
Avg Severity
20.8
Per 10k Props
7 yrs
Case History
Cases by Year
2015: 1
2017: 3 (1 PFEO)
2023: 1 (1 PFEO)
'15 '23
Outcome Breakdown
1
Complied
3
Decision Issued
Complaint Categories
Communication 1 Repairs 2 Financial 1 Written Statement 1 Debt Recovery 1 PF Duties 4

Recent Tribunal Decisions

FTS/HPC/PF/22/2730
2023-03-21T12:00:00Z
Complied

The homeowner complained and the tribunal issued a Property Factor Enforcement Order (PFEO) requiring the factor to pay £200. The factor complied with the order.

FTS/HPC/PF/17/0064
2017-07-25T12:00:00Z
Decision Issued

The homeowner complained that the factor failed to provide a clear breakdown of debt and did not respond to her inquiries. The tribunal found the factor breached the Code of Conduct by not responding to inquiries and failing to include time limits for responses in its written statement. No further action was ordered.

"The Applicant states “I think you should explain to me why you have only recorded payments of £7.05 to my account, yet, I have proof that you have received a total of £1,215.00 to date.”"
HOHP/PF/16/0153
2017-03-07T12:00:00Z
Decision Issued

The homeowner complained about the property factor's failure to manage contractors, resulting in rat infestation and lack of communication. The tribunal found the factor had not breached their duties and dismissed the complaint.

"The tribunal found that the factors were neither in breach of sections 6.1 or 6.4 of the Code nor of their duties."
FTS/HPC/PF/16/1016
2017-02-22T12:00:00Z
PFEO Proposed

The homeowner had a Property Factor Enforcement Order issued against the factor. The tribunal found the factor had complied with the order and the case was closed.

HOHP/PF/14/0112
2015-07-30T12:00:00Z
Decision Issued

The homeowner complained that the property factor failed to communicate about unpaid bills, leading to debt and legal action. The tribunal found the factor had not failed to comply with its duties and dismissed the complaint.

"The homeowner's view was that it was grossly unfair that the property factor had run up all the legal expenses, which she was expected to pay."

Coverage Area

2,401
Properties
12
Postcodes
0
Cities/Towns
Glasgow Newton Mearns Paisley Rutherglen
Considering a change?
Get free, no-obligation quotes from property factors serving your area.
Get Quotes →
Quotes may be provided by partner firms. This does not affect tribunal-rate bands or rankings.
See something wrong?
Help us keep this profile accurate. Report outdated or incorrect information.
Submit a correction →
About this profile

Tribunal data: Sourced from Housing and Property Chamber published decisions. Risk tier calculated as cases per 10,000 properties managed. "RED" = 100+ cases per 10k or multiple enforcement orders.

Reviews: Trustpilot and Google review data aggregated from public sources via APIs.

Company data: Companies House API. Factor register data from gov.scot. TPI membership verified via tpi.org.uk.

Data last updated: January 2026.